We are delighted to be able to offer several prizes, kindly donated by the conference sponsors, for talk and poster contributions to CYBO 2025.
Talks
1st prize: 300€ voucher – Oxford academic
2nd prize: 200€ voucher – Oxford academic
3rd prize: 150€ voucher – Zanichelli
Posters
1st prize: 250€ voucher – Springer
2nd prize: 100€ voucher – Zanichelli
3rd prize: 50€ voucher – Zanichelli
Honorable mention(s): book(s) from Piccin editor.
Evaluation procedure & criteria
Prizes will be assigned according to evaluations provided by the scientific committee (you can find the members at the bottom of this page). Each contribution will be evaluated by at least one member of the scientific committee; for contributions evaluated by more than one scientific committee member, the average score of each category will be used. You can find the categories and criteria used for the evaluation in the table below.
Each evaluation category is equally weighted, and prizes will be assigned based on total score (maximum 50 points for poster, 60 points for talks). In case of ties, placement will be decided with a coin toss. All thematic sessions participate in the same pool, i.e. there will be no session-specific prizes.
Winners will be announced during the closing ceremony, on February 7th, 16:00-17:00, we recommend anyone with a contribution to be present!
Should winners for talks and poster prizes not be present, vouchers can be delivered via email; however for the honorable mention(s) it will not be possible to ship the book, therefore if winner is not present during the closing ceremony, the prize will be assigned to the next candidate.
Posters
Category | Criteria | Poor…1 | Excellent…10 |
---|---|---|---|
Visual Appeal | Graphics quality, color scheme, readability, font size | Poor design, major issues with readability | Outstanding design, perfect balance of elements, excellent readability |
Organization & Layout | Logical flow, efficient use of space, clear sections | Confusing flow, poor space usage | Perfect flow, optimal space usage, clear section distinction |
Content Quality | Clear objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions | Incomplete content, unclear presentation | Comprehensive content, perfectly clear and concise |
Scientific Merit | Research significance, data analysis, interpretation | Weak research quality, inadequate analysis | Exceptional research quality, robust analysis |
Presentation | Overall impact, clarity of message, professionalism | Unclear presentation, minimal impact | Compelling presentation, memorable impact |
Talks
Category | Criteria | Poor…1 | Excellent…10 |
---|---|---|---|
Scientific Merit | Research significance, data analysis, interpretation | Weak research quality, inadequate analysis | Exceptional research quality, robust analysis |
Subject Knowledge, response to questions | Understanding of topic, accuracy of information, handling of Q&A | Limited understanding, significant errors | Demonstrates expert knowledge with deep insights |
Delivery & Speaking Skills | Voice clarity, pace, confidence | Unclear speech, inappropriate pace | Excellent voice projection, natural pace, confident presence |
Content Organization & visual aids | Clear structure, logical flow, coherent arguments, quality of slides | Disorganized, unclear structure | Perfect structure with clear intro, body, and conclusion |
Time Management | Adherence to time limit, balanced sections | Poor time management, very unbalanced | Perfect timing with ideal section balance |